The scientific model may not, finally, have taught all that much about social reality, but it did deal extremely well with the reality of who social scientists were and what they aspired to be. Its set of rules for professional behavior enables its practitioners to resolve some exceptionally awkward questions about what social scientists, as opposed to social science, ought to do. Social scientists could attempt to be objective, even if social science could not. Social scientists could follow well-known rules, even if reality did not.Enjoy!
Basic Rules
FIRST: generate both your own posts and comments on each other's posts. Posts cannot be anonymous. Comments can.
SECOND: experiment with what you say and how you say it, but be sure to respect your fellow classmates.
THIRD: reference your classmates' posts and comments in your own posts and comments. When at all possible, link back to posts.
FOURTH: reference specific portions of the texts we are reading by including the author's last name and page numbers.
SECOND: experiment with what you say and how you say it, but be sure to respect your fellow classmates.
THIRD: reference your classmates' posts and comments in your own posts and comments. When at all possible, link back to posts.
FOURTH: reference specific portions of the texts we are reading by including the author's last name and page numbers.
Friday, September 28, 2007
Wolfe on the professionalization of sociologists
I promised to give you all a page number for where Wolfe talks about how social scientists emulated the natural science model to raise their professional status. On page 48, Wolfe writes:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment